{"id":"W2262552313","doi":"10.2166/wh.2015.105","title":"Arsenic from community water fluoridation: quantifying the effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water and Health","topic":"Arsenic contamination and mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Arsenic; Water fluoridation; Environmental science; Raw water; Arsenic contamination of groundwater; Sanitation; Environmental health; Water supply; Water treatment; Environmental chemistry; Environmental engineering; Chemistry; Medicine; Fluoride","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002069071,0.00004878995,0.000101034,0.00001491702,0.0002309642,0.00002712995,0.00008612005,0.00001910816,0.000146926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009937718,0.00002064698,0.0000255815,0.00001857122,0.00004476021,0.0001744026,0.00006193788,0.0002011083,0.00005106845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008750465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000101377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008171431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000245484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991724,0.0003000668,0.0002088903,0.000040422,0.0001698472,0.0001083561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996921,0.00003671948,0.00007165294,0.00008480678,0.00001216662,0.0001025069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003169762,0.0001918325,0.4014228,0.00006747739,0.00009942875,0.00001990064,0.2215138,0.0004273428,0.04529268,0.0001107725,0.03280406,0.2977329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005279236,0.002761598,0.7400987,0.0001244484,0.00008200126,0.0002772759,0.0082154,0.001528978,0.1085259,0.005235852,0.1275199,0.0003506383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990287,0.00004764557,0.0004392834,0.008591869,0.0001890668,0.00006729017,6.531998e-7,0.000003846852,0.0003733406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998979,0.00002401754,0.000126502,0.0006648687,0.00007438203,6.661422e-7,0.000008358352,0.000003101819,0.0001191482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3386759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1776413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07565045884867756,"score_gpt":0.3186217329018443,"score_spread":0.2429712740531668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}