{"id":"W2262552313","doi":"10.2166/wh.2015.105","title":"Arsenic from community water fluoridation: quantifying the effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water and Health","topic":"Arsenic contamination and mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Arsenic; Water fluoridation; Environmental science; Raw water; Arsenic contamination of groundwater; Sanitation; Environmental health; Water supply; Water treatment; Environmental chemistry; Environmental engineering; Chemistry; Medicine; Fluoride","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003161253,0.0004401349,0.0004493202,0.001128558,0.0003634229,0.0008196771,0.0005449275,0.0007444736,0.0009466332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006842167,0.0002228768,0.0007732014,0.001298495,0.0005832876,0.0007161415,0.001038537,0.0004355936,0.0001664284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001617917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00112077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03484201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04961362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957071,0.001676361,0.0001274967,0.0006254261,0.001697564,0.0001660611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974054,0.001154112,0.0005957366,0.0002287075,0.0005657155,0.00005042403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008834163,0.0004077276,0.7926642,0.001103208,0.001776137,0.0001794826,0.0009162942,0.02152612,0.04392192,0.002672953,0.001073223,0.1328752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000379972,0.002544533,0.896505,0.0001959353,0.001407502,0.0003866171,0.0009937178,0.02810121,0.05374783,0.005654444,0.01035186,0.00007341964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657557,0.00258118,0.01965413,0.0003680017,0.00003256319,0.0003028589,0.001341891,0.00007043618,0.009893251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916922,0.0008738675,0.005388868,0.0001007564,0.00001252136,0.00007524477,0.0005076729,0.00001373363,0.001335163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03484201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06927842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07565045884867756,"score_gpt":0.3186217329018443,"score_spread":0.2429712740531668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}