{"id":"W2262631804","doi":"","title":"구연 : 외상 환자에서의 한국형 응급실 중증도 분류 체계(Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, KTAS)의 유효성","year":2013,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"대한응급의학회 학술대회초록집","topic":"Emergency and Acute Care Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Triage; Scale (ratio); Visual acuity; Medicine; Ophthalmology; Optometry; Medical emergency; Geography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003113647,0.0004832051,0.0005647622,0.001447448,0.0007556147,0.001314812,0.0006051752,0.0004836494,0.008261708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01188399,0.0001824631,0.0008976528,0.002254262,0.0006848903,0.002008507,0.001073931,0.001187747,0.002393464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002032292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004596675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01000006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01091552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971596,0.0004889302,0.0006018162,0.0003641924,0.001058529,0.0003268531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913105,0.0008640819,0.002019037,0.0002073518,0.004810063,0.0007891022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001690672,0.0003442423,0.649929,0.001567076,0.0005474743,0.0002657014,0.001412531,0.0007692477,0.001592482,0.003035565,0.07100093,0.2678451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002159074,0.0004858978,0.9393106,0.0006673682,0.0006007588,0.001227528,0.003634207,0.00145445,0.001276768,0.003274911,0.04768681,0.0001646921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.797016,0.02170853,0.01833428,0.0209642,0.003866144,0.001685195,0.03756637,0.0005778524,0.09828157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722114,0.003747815,0.006814953,0.001024358,0.0003705104,0.0008420573,0.00712076,0.00005389961,0.007814173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01000006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0276382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01554707643160766,"score_gpt":0.2751977208912456,"score_spread":0.2596506444596379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}