{"id":"W2263352300","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-110","title":"Real-time opponent modelling in trick-taking card games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Games","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Adversary; Computer science; Exploit; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Fictitious play; Combinatorial game theory; Simple (philosophy); Game play; Game theory; Artificial intelligence; Repeated game; Human–computer interaction; Computer security; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001927766,0.0008250952,0.0006810059,0.0004075193,0.0004680007,0.001080276,0.00196314,0.0009271062,0.00209447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006417607,0.0005399555,0.0004394754,0.0001756343,0.001387703,0.001696839,0.001296282,0.001562965,0.0003480971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007011326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007463992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003150777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003052079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994259,0.0002102619,0.0000254222,0.0001115212,0.0001364983,0.00009038595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975765,0.001500216,0.0003376924,0.000285731,0.0001696452,0.0001300663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004594299,0.00006054508,0.002068459,0.00005337548,0.00003808187,0.0002584286,0.0002603273,0.9339762,0.007670272,0.02681017,0.0005345712,0.02781028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005164106,0.00001856129,0.00009321619,0.000001640537,0.000002473718,0.00001438935,0.000007981621,0.9950817,0.0008619271,0.003783872,0.0001243621,0.000004727394],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1003179,0.00005651437,0.8972263,0.0001040854,0.00002844707,0.00004761316,0.00002874903,0.0005771656,0.001613124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921689,0.00003896318,0.1055877,0.00003777994,0.0000127365,0.00004768436,0.00003809728,0.00009567138,0.001972335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003150777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01019514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2449692563154638,"score_gpt":0.3325261987870742,"score_spread":0.08755694247161039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}