{"id":"W2263352300","doi":"10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/ijcai11-110","title":"Real-time opponent modelling in trick-taking card games","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Games","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Adversary; Computer science; Exploit; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Fictitious play; Combinatorial game theory; Simple (philosophy); Game play; Game theory; Artificial intelligence; Repeated game; Human–computer interaction; Computer security; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009852044,0.0004803919,0.0004977644,0.0009366696,0.0001479129,0.0004580443,0.002619029,0.0002021684,0.001207795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003886316,0.0004864166,0.0002340857,0.0007198203,0.000255443,0.001020642,0.0004755202,0.0005550963,0.002619682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003519108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001859461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001600669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952331,0.0002032966,0.001545429,0.001208762,0.001040888,0.000768533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973853,0.0002533788,0.0006200561,0.0009107239,0.0005908036,0.0002397019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001043352,0.0004266507,0.0001659504,0.000006164203,0.00003674255,0.0001645787,0.004927398,0.01202999,0.007298515,0.7953526,0.00005199852,0.1794351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003028288,0.0001515688,0.0002867973,0.0001871536,0.000005422013,0.00001617724,0.0005324904,0.6917168,0.1134457,0.193006,0.0001329603,0.0004887123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06207582,0.00002169243,0.8345947,0.001513335,0.001952744,0.0004790873,0.00001130648,0.0004011049,0.09895021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614643,0.0002368761,0.03727798,0.0002282208,0.0001937735,0.00008176114,0.000007277125,0.00003398837,0.0004757582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2449692563154638,"score_gpt":0.3325261987870742,"score_spread":0.08755694247161039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}