{"id":"W2264260275","doi":"","title":"Rights-based judicial review and subtantive equality for aboriginal peoples: The case of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Fundamental rights; Judicial interpretation; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009668762,0.0001561223,0.0004553143,0.000008105538,0.001076591,0.00002668953,0.0002373485,0.00005485398,0.000695386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000481212,0.0001064424,0.0001029314,0.0001671582,0.0005366049,0.0001045452,0.00001127477,0.0001065415,0.00001338194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001629069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000996848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9761519,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983813,0.0003564325,0.0004143716,0.00019853,0.0002046502,0.0004446958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989741,0.0002669596,0.0002517922,0.0002540458,0.00007559131,0.0001775215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007251411,0.0001326749,0.0006661212,0.02356537,0.000125425,0.00007821539,0.005659885,4.111497e-7,0.000008586047,0.9155465,0.04994515,0.004264371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001139803,0.00005754279,0.0002904521,0.002114523,0.0003055924,0.00002723011,0.0002121043,7.403258e-8,0.00004274516,0.001296365,0.9953491,0.000190254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2752995,0.5286062,0.00003301042,0.08854416,0.0007858258,0.03233806,0.002585498,0.0001120051,0.07169577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8920317,0.09074602,0.0001500517,0.01458604,0.0002022634,0.0003748793,0.00003187388,0.0000190401,0.001858124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8280377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02417302301368935,"score_gpt":0.346622313714006,"score_spread":0.3224492907003167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}