{"id":"W2265388694","doi":"","title":"Improving the Judicial Review of Common-Law Argumentation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Normative; Rhetoric; Constructive; Epistemology; Legal practice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Dimension (graph theory); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2745837,0.0008082522,0.003164446,0.01865454,0.006653152,0.01770881,0.005592586,0.005889419,0.006038641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6058794,0.001165121,0.001045152,0.008112463,0.00729316,0.02071979,0.01042786,0.005424067,0.002157752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009708412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02651433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005187362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007833662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5986707,0.3017958,0.02287439,0.01174863,0.06092757,0.003983002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2938203,0.4200214,0.03045601,0.05633074,0.1936329,0.00573866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002984189,0.0002204347,0.007122161,0.001778489,0.0002455723,0.0004771039,0.01521134,0.003970472,0.00198125,0.2572573,0.05496996,0.6564676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005120557,0.000426108,0.01451248,0.004704052,0.0005543897,0.0007959508,0.01139597,0.03241691,0.008403705,0.4652046,0.4606667,0.0004070711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1726106,0.08189715,0.3437169,0.1817292,0.0109572,0.002451617,0.0005775945,0.00245571,0.2036041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8412556,0.009658739,0.1303509,0.004661356,0.003884763,0.0005756794,0.0005208121,0.0003819427,0.008710279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2745837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8945674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02019405078621806,"score_gpt":0.293619986061204,"score_spread":0.273425935274986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}