{"id":"W2265405755","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1302044","title":"Metaconversation as a Vehicle of Dominant Logic Formation: The Case of Affirmative Action","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00749592,0.000313807,0.000484498,0.001194587,0.005666022,0.008505125,0.001800886,0.003393603,0.01324129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0259548,0.0005499696,0.0006455031,0.0007873718,0.01157269,0.009618733,0.004544224,0.002831513,0.0009877679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002406009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002740371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00466897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004172394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949489,0.002778811,0.0001208157,0.0005156525,0.00093909,0.0006966699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805196,0.01385236,0.0008452017,0.002810655,0.001241986,0.0007301846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005498587,0.00003397125,0.0004579139,0.00001297738,0.000005734737,0.0003282973,0.008032349,0.0005487996,0.000625234,0.9844149,0.0006259711,0.004858763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007911595,0.0000326656,0.0003780667,0.00002122378,0.00001405209,0.0002659429,0.003464597,0.01180076,0.001613117,0.9743317,0.007969819,0.00002901268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4462554,0.0002425308,0.146805,0.009268061,0.0001596104,0.0001232256,0.00008242414,0.0003634395,0.3967004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850499,0.0000247571,0.009709843,0.0001091523,0.00001716113,0.00003630305,0.00001156791,0.00003613725,0.005005266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01324129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0442965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01986251958565283,"score_gpt":0.2341520645370146,"score_spread":0.2142895449513618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}