{"id":"W2265412228","doi":"10.1017/s0001924000013300","title":"‘Smart spring’ identification for hovering rotor aeroelastic-stability augmentation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Aeronautical Journal","topic":"Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Aeroelasticity; Control theory (sociology); Spring (device); Helicopter rotor; Modal; Structural engineering; Stiffness; Rotor (electric); Smart material; Controller (irrigation); Aerodynamics; Cantilever; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Aerospace engineering; Materials science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007386017,0.0001290277,0.0001348069,0.00003122544,0.0003241283,0.00016466,0.0001528132,0.00005971019,0.0002065301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004362584,0.00009992452,0.00009579906,0.00008535254,0.00005978612,0.0002766348,0.00001050746,0.0002709683,0.00005724819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001349966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003320413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001102498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008670183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998896,0.00008606661,0.0004000692,0.0001185855,0.0002199176,0.0002793368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.0003522356,0.00006276306,0.0001669099,0.00008274641,0.0001179061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007504683,0.0005450853,0.006171219,0.0004260025,0.0007910949,0.00001199339,0.002427354,0.1779492,0.4488859,0.3243643,0.004101805,0.03357564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00696767,0.0005151731,0.07263434,0.0001303647,0.0005689301,0.0002706406,0.001049347,0.6781502,0.1795514,0.02819086,0.03077094,0.001200105],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2120082,0.00007824023,0.7860477,0.0003170531,0.000779954,0.0003283572,0.000005281921,0.00008054805,0.0003546401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971655,0.0000147364,0.002410236,0.00007908111,0.0002176487,0.00005005205,0.000002134639,0.00002207757,0.00003854875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7851573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4074804,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01978813653212286,"score_gpt":0.2314772449558309,"score_spread":0.2116891084237081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}