{"id":"W2265464138","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9965.2009.00378.x","title":"MAXIMIZING THE GROWTH RATE UNDER RISK CONSTRAINTS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Finance","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Portfolio; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Ergodic theory; Context (archaeology); Incomplete markets; Isoelastic utility; Maximization; Constant (computer programming); Financial market; Mathematics; Value at risk; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Risk management; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001986945,0.0009821693,0.0009690422,0.0004905707,0.0002767277,0.001475774,0.0007409239,0.001191237,0.001430706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007120735,0.0004459652,0.0006085656,0.0005428603,0.001357576,0.002287928,0.001343263,0.0009417097,0.0003099056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001006458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001112782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001671785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008050086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.0002299069,0.00001680375,0.00008479948,0.00007340527,0.00009729349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982865,0.001048494,0.0002816466,0.00009944873,0.0001574427,0.0001263376],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004708854,0.00003318844,0.0003556336,0.00006410878,0.00002710139,0.0001097669,0.00006633029,0.77186,0.001918501,0.2160522,0.0007465759,0.008719414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118363,0.00003464159,0.0001042956,0.00001365457,0.000009144158,0.00002929766,0.00001476745,0.9365799,0.000593046,0.06203271,0.0005663256,0.00001051196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1497163,0.0009684811,0.8316432,0.001359082,0.00006448054,0.00004532293,0.0001052966,0.0001312017,0.01596664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525272,0.001298475,0.03683922,0.00009654459,0.0000861346,0.00009272038,0.00008876573,0.00009386632,0.008877021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001986945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01050812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05859409147533349,"score_gpt":0.338547222245301,"score_spread":0.2799531307699675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}