{"id":"W2265527373","doi":"","title":"The Paradox of Judicial Deference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Judicial deference; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Mistake; Law; Judicial review; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008480474,0.0001784729,0.0004696346,0.001674714,0.006728302,0.006893126,0.001395665,0.003221013,0.002647787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03568474,0.0002093782,0.0003121411,0.001370402,0.02134476,0.004348707,0.003687325,0.00410768,0.0002405747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01493692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01570311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1294751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09811208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897866,0.002516689,0.0002022562,0.0007296143,0.005016362,0.00174841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895316,0.005787341,0.0007221322,0.0008489983,0.002523075,0.0005867336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008863533,0.000004756258,0.0003089144,0.00001422271,0.000002868504,0.0000887604,0.002097681,0.0002348583,0.0001000662,0.9911786,0.001561036,0.004399423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002996201,0.00001665814,0.002302227,0.0001092199,0.00001354966,0.0001960592,0.002489653,0.001115264,0.0002853507,0.9371844,0.05622597,0.00003174039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2668225,0.008212892,0.02414327,0.07845458,0.0005999796,0.00003914829,0.0001011703,0.0001117774,0.6215146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937702,0.0005300993,0.0005335757,0.001786104,0.00008518439,0.000007488957,0.000007165161,0.000009186159,0.003271136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1294751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.257443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0103198920637521,"score_gpt":0.2612454779054094,"score_spread":0.2509255858416573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}