{"id":"W2265527373","doi":"","title":"The Paradox of Judicial Deference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Judicial deference; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Mistake; Law; Judicial review; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001428647,0.000054321,0.00008888952,0.00002086469,0.001819766,0.00003336379,0.0002393639,0.00003263611,0.0000102927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001166798,0.0000364831,0.00007467573,0.0001669239,0.0006148933,0.00006761304,0.00001875304,0.0004321565,0.00001383272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000266387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002582475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0983711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982402,0.00008959298,0.0001824812,0.00006464081,0.0003548362,0.001068287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995791,0.0001165858,0.0001148669,0.00004375837,0.000120616,0.0000250941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001338573,0.00001494774,0.003915222,1.512486e-7,0.00002292892,4.138289e-7,0.000122713,0.000004577952,0.00001827596,0.9867232,0.0002102656,0.008953853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000950875,0.00003735432,0.004041202,0.000004823979,0.00001285836,0.000007390197,0.003345438,7.405814e-7,0.00001406085,0.9601613,0.03223128,0.00004849903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5589143,0.0366885,0.003699978,0.01378386,0.001131864,0.0002449509,0.000004150575,0.00005275656,0.3854797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915804,0.006903778,0.0000080176,0.00002476192,0.0007780666,0.000002092164,2.349785e-7,0.000002262751,0.0007004326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4326661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0103198920637521,"score_gpt":0.2612454779054094,"score_spread":0.2509255858416573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}