{"id":"W2266774877","doi":"","title":"An Ounce of Common Sense is Worth a Pound of Theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Fluid ounce (US); Pound (networking); Dozen; Common sense; Process (computing); Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Arithmetic; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001257765,0.0001155349,0.0002296045,0.0001149377,0.00006571328,0.00001120896,0.0001688035,0.00008801808,0.001861125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001842592,0.00009669735,0.0001285151,0.0001663973,0.0000823882,0.0001027137,0.000008983484,0.0008162574,0.00006428441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009060913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001224593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000968283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002818051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998067,0.0003586234,0.0003264452,0.0001482784,0.000210614,0.0008890921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999217,0.00006792491,0.0002808059,0.0002785113,0.00009855509,0.00005718515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009734409,0.002251141,0.004686961,0.00002972592,0.00132195,0.00008243452,0.02453778,0.000005178294,0.009556607,0.6948001,0.001554023,0.2602006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00339917,0.00306134,0.006190928,0.00006889505,0.0003929726,0.003467438,0.03382055,0.00007490821,0.003020389,0.9446349,0.001420479,0.0004479969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.967137,0.007887166,0.001557246,0.00009484118,0.0001746348,0.00007664058,0.00001024746,0.00001471554,0.02304754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952682,0.0009460843,0.00002646175,0.00022118,0.0001577038,0.000002192805,0.000003340683,0.00001857475,0.003356256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2597526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01438096052985067,"score_gpt":0.2807483877914523,"score_spread":0.2663674272616017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}