{"id":"W2269229896","doi":"","title":"Empty Ritual, Mechanical Exercise or the Discipline of Deference?: Revisiting the Standard of Review in Administrative Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Standard of review; Sophistication; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Doctrine; Political science; Judicial review; Transparency (behavior); State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009047035,0.00009927659,0.0003905975,0.00001972625,0.0005160457,0.00003962191,0.0004101715,0.00005581234,0.00008948323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001084449,0.00004317947,0.000108867,0.0004769014,0.0002868655,0.000151056,0.0000266179,0.0008750377,0.000001312082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002165135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003807242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00118408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03575666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973097,0.0006621482,0.0005957443,0.0001204667,0.0005235862,0.0007883432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988621,0.0002751622,0.0004598759,0.0001332354,0.0002202266,0.00004943474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007883936,0.00002265503,0.0001155848,0.00009682708,0.00002422041,0.00000136104,0.001954227,8.615855e-7,0.00001651787,0.9902439,0.0000378347,0.007407235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001073956,0.001129829,0.0001031366,0.008317051,0.0002597248,0.0001005532,0.1003148,0.000003956887,0.0009262515,0.8150922,0.07231485,0.0003637198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1877183,0.5758278,0.004140723,0.09699751,0.001005501,0.005405625,0.0000764295,0.00007445712,0.1287536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935892,0.06366373,0.00002048284,0.00007201533,0.0001418919,0.000006570543,3.083784e-7,0.000006271835,0.0001967312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7481737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04074406272547496,"score_gpt":0.3629541067238302,"score_spread":0.3222100439983553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}