{"id":"W2269455269","doi":"10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000843","title":"Critical Appraisal of Common Simplified Assumptions in Seismic Stability Analyses of Gravity Dams","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities","topic":"Dam Engineering and Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gravity dam; Geotechnical engineering; Cohesion (chemistry); Geology; Residual; Safety factor; Stiffness; Factor of safety; Residual strength; Stability (learning theory); Displacement (psychology); Structural engineering; Engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062847,0.0009972203,0.0006526933,0.001459983,0.000626273,0.001234961,0.001546558,0.000643093,0.001570518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02491185,0.0003573218,0.0006583253,0.0007607826,0.002443122,0.001447484,0.002181654,0.001561333,0.0004264887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001318432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009073836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002296137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001599216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949577,0.002697223,0.0002947981,0.0002569476,0.001658674,0.0001347459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880927,0.007879026,0.001169386,0.001504289,0.001273777,0.00008070115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005717356,0.00008721776,0.003418472,0.001821263,0.0001817637,0.00187632,0.001035051,0.4683522,0.01997652,0.3099598,0.01013958,0.1825802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007939597,0.0004033762,0.003914581,0.000982736,0.000136218,0.0006839111,0.0004677004,0.6980367,0.01787051,0.2429453,0.03432906,0.0001505605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05168325,0.005717803,0.9315451,0.001788886,0.0004138857,0.0002373646,0.0002301413,0.0003849742,0.007998749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6834286,0.01174689,0.2995051,0.0006910293,0.001304082,0.0004423414,0.0003788544,0.0002299808,0.002273152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03323704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02829849218666619,"score_gpt":0.3006708395359411,"score_spread":0.2723723473492749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}