{"id":"W2269810933","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2721920","title":"Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication (Part Two): An Examination of Hypotheses of Bias in Investment Treaty Arbitration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Treaty; Arbitration; Investment arbitration; Law; Political science; International investment; Foreign direct investment","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05124679,0.0004024732,0.001005356,0.001823806,0.001648652,0.003981283,0.00190691,0.005483033,0.01011907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.252474,0.0004630887,0.001250243,0.001256907,0.007605657,0.007648642,0.003057067,0.003923004,0.0007649853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002123915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002337262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002519993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002236712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9763494,0.01372563,0.001648795,0.00190965,0.004373522,0.00199318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4511616,0.4683025,0.05194872,0.01779988,0.008337284,0.002450035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007462719,0.002692528,0.425843,0.0006367782,0.0004319059,0.0009807805,0.03401307,0.007030732,0.005871344,0.4292464,0.003444753,0.08234606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001860783,0.002949259,0.3914567,0.0004018396,0.0004884676,0.001019311,0.01731911,0.06476001,0.006898947,0.5054502,0.00714603,0.0002492593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584483,0.0002970939,0.01047371,0.002943374,0.00006277916,0.0003641521,0.0001021501,0.00002242611,0.02728605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972166,0.000069919,0.001180355,0.0003665164,0.00004336834,0.00008116115,0.00003725995,0.000008658048,0.0009961267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05124679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2710222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03128698707773928,"score_gpt":0.2565371714899012,"score_spread":0.2252501844121619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}