{"id":"W2269910146","doi":"10.4271/2005-01-3571","title":"Dynamic Analysis of Soil Tillage Using Computational Fluid Dynamics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series","topic":"Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Tillage; Computer science; Dynamics (music); Computational fluid dynamics; Soil science; Environmental science; Aerospace engineering; Engineering; Physics; Agronomy; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001433749,0.0003474094,0.0003480429,0.0006724211,0.0003999584,0.0006547787,0.0003018159,0.0004818837,0.0009622551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004993968,0.0001927335,0.0004249709,0.0003809943,0.0003335184,0.0004932005,0.0002901777,0.000275112,0.0001253229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004776626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008836435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01006702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005578661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999909,0.00001288279,0.000004679732,0.00001294432,0.00004557038,0.0000149663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998261,0.00009924616,0.00001764501,0.00000953558,0.00003666974,0.00001076372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000488603,0.0000673348,0.002771224,0.00005683862,0.00002079912,0.0001436103,0.00008659683,0.9558296,0.02143948,0.003463698,0.0002543536,0.0158176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003164485,0.000007314083,0.0004550683,0.000002687421,0.000001633341,0.000008874085,0.000008182436,0.9970932,0.001784518,0.0002348828,0.0003967482,0.000003676181],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7044545,0.0004957371,0.2802798,0.0002430625,0.00007008157,0.0001590246,0.0005226507,0.0006737575,0.01310145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641328,0.0002581199,0.03268829,0.00001999545,0.00001318438,0.00009271389,0.0002669914,0.00004966471,0.002478232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01006702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02001685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008351115983980377,"score_gpt":0.2365524422360408,"score_spread":0.2282013262520604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}