{"id":"W2270295388","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.008","title":"Likelihood ratio meta-analysis: New motivation and approach for an old method","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Clinical Trials","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Jewish General Hospital; McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Statistics; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6552467,0.0004711186,0.01901346,0.000544573,0.0001435569,0.001000952,0.001507092,0.0003290668,0.003246066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4732823,0.0001662016,0.01651991,0.001445559,0.00009084077,0.0009803767,0.0001282128,0.0001445242,0.000166608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001133366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002719369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000195341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008227713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8370435,0.1203292,0.03608674,0.002814762,0.003379618,0.0003461892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6398043,0.3171004,0.029733,0.009259402,0.002642151,0.00146072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005499349,0.0006694261,0.03063177,0.00005675178,0.3058009,0.000002006497,0.0002873864,0.00005006009,0.0004549689,0.01498808,0.3996959,0.2468129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009511508,0.001382325,0.008942916,0.00001902828,0.5078632,0.000004343462,0.000760357,0.02552372,0.0002755496,0.2676834,0.1766878,0.001345965],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009010468,0.003351399,0.9851848,0.004711387,0.0002384378,0.003339129,0.0001462095,0.00001754247,0.002110047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5842678,0.00009573135,0.3488489,0.003069344,0.001473263,0.0005292704,0.0001005391,0.0000455106,0.06156966],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6363359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9790583276220761,"score_gpt":0.6859791808720148,"score_spread":0.2930791467500613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}