{"id":"W2270450583","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2010.021","title":"Evaluation of Short-Term Fish Reproductive Bioassays for Predicting Effects of a Canadian Bleached Kraft Mill Effluent","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Guelph; University of New Brunswick; FPInnovations; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Bioassay; Biology; Effluent; Vitellogenin; Minnow; Pimephales promelas; Paper mill; Toxicology; Environmental chemistry; Ecology; Fishery; Chemistry; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02960193,0.0000897783,0.00019793,0.0002840547,0.0004492642,0.00002221069,0.0002836063,0.00008321197,0.0004476579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002926283,0.0000660045,0.00008787015,0.0002116832,0.0005009851,0.0001827196,0.0002167991,0.0004741844,0.000009853439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002391974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000717475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01138163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1770634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966612,0.001028649,0.0003912541,0.000283226,0.001113681,0.0005219696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988242,0.00028468,0.00008976502,0.0002777551,0.0003680944,0.0001554935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001174849,0.0003048213,0.6809527,0.0002516019,0.0004223762,0.000007403862,0.008159976,0.0001454481,0.2857789,0.00007264521,0.01882484,0.004961867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008663862,0.0003463893,0.8155634,0.00003568107,0.0001124336,0.000007164179,0.0005054684,0.0002874906,0.177347,0.003666773,0.001149604,0.0001122019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938883,0.00001167908,0.00002927729,0.002737929,0.0002727898,0.0009157917,0.00001196003,0.000004878837,0.002127366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992524,0.00002335552,0.0003118632,0.00004124952,0.0001055816,0.0000830969,0.000006457853,0.000007809049,0.0001681273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1656817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.114440846046073,"score_gpt":0.3919647088116194,"score_spread":0.2775238627655465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}