{"id":"W2271865752","doi":"","title":"Dialogic Judicial Review and its Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Constitutional theory; Politics; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001034714,0.00007869428,0.0001771929,0.00002908189,0.00192764,0.00001531921,0.0001286007,0.00004251501,0.00004902075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004349489,0.00006760135,0.00005847741,0.0001626506,0.0003488219,0.0001381787,0.00002761235,0.0005980908,0.00003943706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000281205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002346863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005402284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003262542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982135,0.0001066363,0.0001621987,0.0001044871,0.0002800045,0.001133152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996305,0.00004887463,0.00005791123,0.00003039334,0.0001454901,0.00008679161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003329726,0.0000182547,0.0007461719,0.000005485806,0.00003694875,0.000008416223,0.0003245882,1.331569e-7,0.000004832513,0.9960726,0.0006412448,0.002137981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002363405,0.0001245405,0.001577418,0.00009595879,0.0001300636,0.0004427646,0.001464456,5.850819e-7,0.00000294218,0.9155332,0.0801864,0.0002052774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06180369,0.8184388,0.0002598175,0.03017972,0.0005181524,0.0002964447,0.000004314691,0.00006420652,0.08843483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5689776,0.4293668,0.000004428299,0.0007908484,0.0004873029,0.000002189113,2.590325e-7,0.000002206684,0.0003684155],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5071739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03237620147723794,"score_gpt":0.3005861337771629,"score_spread":0.268209932299925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}