{"id":"W2272051280","doi":"","title":"A bottom up approach to evaluate risk assessment tools for drinking water safety in First Nations communities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Water Quality and Resources Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Water safety; Environmental planning; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science; Computer security; Water quality","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06973474,0.00238906,0.001806096,0.01816964,0.00357937,0.008637222,0.0021864,0.001392192,0.007606482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1665951,0.0007251018,0.003596802,0.00953751,0.002170558,0.00486478,0.005923419,0.002692294,0.001136779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007853593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009383002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005986275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008811304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9221517,0.0455458,0.008316089,0.002101627,0.01974187,0.002142968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8050388,0.1065614,0.008303799,0.007790869,0.07076268,0.001542393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001624691,0.002771301,0.06736894,0.004570679,0.0008608091,0.0007155542,0.03686027,0.01442501,0.01278214,0.04553921,0.01047587,0.8020055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001473386,0.01596752,0.2226665,0.0129571,0.003294389,0.001660121,0.1979616,0.1614157,0.07647802,0.1392251,0.1652724,0.001628155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3810344,0.001269314,0.4626597,0.00152339,0.0003739583,0.03939213,0.002679738,0.001045795,0.1100215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2398864,0.0003268491,0.7375306,0.0001760384,0.0000266294,0.01769567,0.001004744,0.0001514315,0.003201623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3687969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04862357607195246,"score_gpt":0.2607629616211734,"score_spread":0.2121393855492209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}