{"id":"W2273449809","doi":"10.1017/s006900580000953x","title":"Objectivity and Statutory Interpretation: End Use in the Canadian Customs Tariff","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Statutory interpretation; Objectivity (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; International trade; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008112799,0.000172153,0.0001717473,0.0007473456,0.0003689745,0.0003627022,0.0009249049,0.0001687421,0.0007413197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006637311,0.0001976021,0.00006596749,0.0003344097,0.0004983566,0.00077133,0.00001911161,0.0003569612,0.00001715882],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005088348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003822692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.971889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979375,0.0001657337,0.0003642166,0.0003351147,0.0006548344,0.000542612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983056,0.0001978215,0.0001351078,0.0002123193,0.000480312,0.0006688713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001333176,0.00002180108,0.02767803,0.000002052727,0.0000435411,0.0001457678,0.006075817,0.00007740166,0.000009026465,0.9620151,0.002349418,0.001568704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004354116,0.00004784941,0.3335413,0.00008887479,0.00001820276,0.00006833966,0.00140291,0.0005315659,0.00003031605,0.01024048,0.6532409,0.0003538543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.174889,0.00008676968,0.00005884435,0.05842056,0.001497421,0.0006094327,0.0007176405,0.0000478772,0.7636725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897037,0.00002281941,0.0002576879,0.006546996,0.0002909378,0.00001504087,0.0001081013,0.00001836373,0.003036327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9517747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007486774231538602,"score_gpt":0.2348374058992554,"score_spread":0.2273506316677168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}