{"id":"W2273449809","doi":"10.1017/s006900580000953x","title":"Objectivity and Statutory Interpretation: End Use in the Canadian Customs Tariff","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Statutory interpretation; Objectivity (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; International trade; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01490864,0.0005782581,0.0005531315,0.005228179,0.01721649,0.0151576,0.003361811,0.005227148,0.003389129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02582934,0.0006652041,0.0008289496,0.005658317,0.03132193,0.003675594,0.004531494,0.007323066,0.0003420685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1317616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1460357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9722518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9677013,0.004500971,0.001300641,0.00203513,0.0202449,0.004217023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746109,0.009350773,0.0009919322,0.00150811,0.01299767,0.0005404705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006431045,0.000004465364,0.0006719987,0.00002462698,0.000002911152,0.0001165581,0.008042987,0.0002201218,0.000101579,0.9753204,0.01048092,0.005006877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002716163,0.00002074111,0.01066444,0.001200181,0.00007242354,0.0002702125,0.0186492,0.002983062,0.00127284,0.2824854,0.6821222,0.0002321318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0378761,0.004272182,0.008928544,0.0362552,0.0006371739,0.0001823651,0.0005185204,0.00008965096,0.9112402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8888589,0.003066499,0.01081262,0.01291151,0.000267293,0.000172248,0.0003695481,0.0001347945,0.08340649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1317616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9560019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007486774231538602,"score_gpt":0.2348374058992554,"score_spread":0.2273506316677168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}