{"id":"W2273748753","doi":"","title":"Environmental Impact Assessment Under the Protocol on Environment Protection to the Antarctic Treaty and Australian Legislation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UTAS Research Repository","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Antarctic treaty; Commonwealth; Protocol (science); Government (linguistics); Treaty; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Montreal Protocol; Political science; Business; Geography; Law; Environmental science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009750562,0.0001587316,0.00008286834,0.00004892231,0.0007926312,0.0001499856,0.0003097495,0.00005914025,0.001129054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001435643,0.0000898306,0.00005246948,0.00009777419,0.0003880855,0.0002456905,0.0002694365,0.0004608312,0.0007010712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002085172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001896984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001820794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001087044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971654,0.0005188487,0.0002060144,0.0004072007,0.001326458,0.0003761053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992523,0.0001235297,0.00005520884,0.0004311586,0.000006009452,0.0001317669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002010906,0.003630614,0.1103361,0.00005130027,0.0004389737,0.0001227923,0.005616138,0.2162242,0.4156318,0.00540627,0.05365672,0.1868742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000363783,0.0008744482,0.7374142,0.00001819614,0.000008255276,0.00006586999,0.0002261171,0.004135939,0.01273416,0.0002949815,0.2437007,0.0001633954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9081888,0.000006196885,0.0001242811,0.02146921,0.00005822842,0.04926894,0.00001650903,0.00003488631,0.02083302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699371,0.000002256594,0.000175319,0.0001609766,0.000246402,0.02273577,0.000003449995,0.00001769828,0.006720979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6270781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03973550603944753,"score_gpt":0.3753146595639261,"score_spread":0.3355791535244786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}