{"id":"W2274220625","doi":"10.1111/raju.12115","title":"An Argumentation Interface for Expert Opinion Evidence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Credibility; Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Matching (statistics); Computer science; Rigour; Reliability (semiconductor); Epistemology; Work (physics); Expert opinion; Boundary-work; Public opinion; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002450748,0.00007520815,0.00007311292,0.00004423118,0.00008554076,0.0001107322,0.0002843641,0.00003524351,0.00002105253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004996763,0.00005267085,0.00003128921,0.00006768516,0.000008350415,0.001786188,0.00002495193,0.00001488253,0.00006123879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006210407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000284777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003966192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001175997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992158,0.00006203853,0.0001867635,0.0002693121,0.0001454125,0.0001206522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993306,0.0001189322,0.00009948348,0.0003247538,0.00007618093,0.00005005567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003360974,0.0001010649,0.001148452,0.00003134374,0.00001952774,4.218194e-7,0.005913842,0.00008941227,0.7539098,0.01497201,0.01710239,0.2066782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001488962,0.0007399729,0.01016424,0.0004668445,0.000004477,0.000005709127,0.000115837,0.2032775,0.7351336,0.001158089,0.04693578,0.000508955],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01509553,0.000232715,0.9814939,0.001907994,0.0008226243,0.0003311406,0.000002162475,0.00008949701,0.00002438616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769556,0.0001037044,0.02219972,0.0001388413,0.0002345592,0.0000985057,0.000002685399,0.000006247608,0.0002601431],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9618601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2147855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06657413016424077,"score_gpt":0.3698759947568834,"score_spread":0.3033018645926426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}