{"id":"W2274847537","doi":"10.5860/rbm.16.2.446","title":"Aims and Approaches in Special Collections Assessment: A Case Study from the Osler Library","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RBM A Journal of Rare Books Manuscripts and Cultural Heritage","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Special collections; Digital collections; National library; Plan (archaeology); Subject (documents); Collection development; History; Computer science; World Wide Web; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01354409,0.0007476321,0.0007362121,0.002824769,0.03952882,0.01100108,0.004537689,0.003781821,0.005147732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02297819,0.0007172675,0.0006184133,0.004110456,0.01484424,0.004600161,0.01135798,0.00563387,0.0005911703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03366868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03869428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.238309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5173336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877272,0.007442608,0.0004431374,0.0005695756,0.001475939,0.002341609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866198,0.005678438,0.0009651972,0.0005645209,0.001779174,0.004392925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002908861,0.0002651072,0.008612386,0.0002017154,0.00001171276,0.02078335,0.9307542,0.0001043976,0.0002552138,0.01392336,0.006391076,0.01866844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004504697,0.00003181517,0.002500921,0.0002370612,0.00001133358,0.00345611,0.9552889,0.00009520718,0.0002314897,0.001060831,0.03705333,0.00002841639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8628221,0.00281202,0.004394778,0.02896206,0.000282698,0.001032283,0.0001645821,0.00009918147,0.09943043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630558,0.002347492,0.006768896,0.00307179,0.00007894616,0.0003458584,0.00005676033,0.00009318192,0.02418131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.761691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4738438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09159976993097499,"score_gpt":0.2677203477719626,"score_spread":0.1761205778409876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}