{"id":"W2274993288","doi":"10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.135","title":"Syntactic Cues to Individuation in Mandarin Chinese","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Science","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Noun; Linguistics; Syntax; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005591534,0.0002454018,0.0002017638,0.0006229693,0.0005293862,0.0006620945,0.0002594161,0.00032655,0.001616598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002964108,0.0002710859,0.0001649314,0.0003370704,0.0008929656,0.0008114344,0.0008174466,0.0003223692,0.0001889666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005787439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003853617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006582971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008136934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997677,0.0000536553,0.00002359059,0.00006452221,0.00006115608,0.00002940884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983497,0.0007819379,0.0003982431,0.0001219626,0.0002479574,0.0001003607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007572621,0.00005746544,0.09603199,0.0004293748,0.00004273981,0.003586133,0.04742719,0.000491398,0.7892426,0.007639058,0.0005040605,0.05379086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003425172,0.0003483904,0.8747453,0.00008169835,0.0001103134,0.002696808,0.01181323,0.002843005,0.09604058,0.005589555,0.005551018,0.0001458192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965341,0.0001011554,0.0005086156,0.00004814343,0.00000457402,0.000004953692,0.0000315015,0.00001538083,0.002751433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985989,0.00009882238,0.0007533403,0.00002567707,0.000004547017,0.000005516866,0.0000422976,0.00001266593,0.0004581702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006582971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0130893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02054770571221965,"score_gpt":0.3618327478155496,"score_spread":0.34128504210333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}