{"id":"W2274993288","doi":"10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.135","title":"Syntactic Cues to Individuation in Mandarin Chinese","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Science","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Noun; Linguistics; Syntax; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490412,0.00008848874,0.0001622257,0.0006845725,0.00008085441,0.0000777087,0.0002267574,0.0000345202,0.0002514304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00131401,0.00006643652,0.00004908,0.001147907,0.0001014407,0.0005617724,0.00001694081,0.0002090639,0.0001067473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005563414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001156343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001574918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002278469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986978,0.00009681712,0.0003060114,0.0001692529,0.0005019618,0.0002282206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989948,0.0001548471,0.0002131157,0.00007401426,0.0004393579,0.0001238484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001194474,0.001353656,0.09678987,0.000008827275,0.00005372469,0.0006867314,0.0600021,0.00001272141,0.02730052,0.003192616,0.0003737983,0.809031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000785396,0.0006259332,0.9864661,0.0001320217,0.00002193997,0.0001629195,0.002488626,0.000006091496,0.001778347,0.007395753,0.00003894861,0.00009793091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727628,0.0001365592,0.002712896,0.0004678592,0.0004703345,0.0001265407,0.000003380262,0.000006516276,0.02331316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982263,0.000007739606,0.0002560405,0.001210433,0.0001585672,0.000002641491,8.138331e-7,0.000003464083,0.0001340353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8896762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2752987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02054770571221965,"score_gpt":0.3618327478155496,"score_spread":0.34128504210333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}