{"id":"W2276066215","doi":"10.2136/vzj2015.01.0015","title":"Limit of Anisotropic Hydraulic Conductivity Ratio of Homogeneous Granular Materials","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vadose Zone Journal","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anisotropy; Porosity; Permeability (electromagnetism); Hydraulic conductivity; Materials science; Porous medium; Perpendicular; Granular material; Mechanics; Geometry; Geology; Composite material; Physics; Optics; Chemistry; Mathematics; Soil water; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009636836,0.0005817486,0.0006980128,0.001945737,0.0006763525,0.001763733,0.0006990356,0.00083028,0.001574537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005001027,0.0005367809,0.0005094165,0.0004496192,0.001905047,0.002223823,0.001272794,0.0008152762,0.0005377341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006525898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002679364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005480792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001674835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985526,0.0001867688,0.00008151222,0.0003527861,0.0005407736,0.0002854612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976109,0.001314712,0.00037549,0.0002315395,0.0003168348,0.0001505922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005703106,0.0001422986,0.004182674,0.0006832787,0.00006813912,0.002138342,0.0005414187,0.07322926,0.3112252,0.5708967,0.002282588,0.03403974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008547183,0.0002819676,0.007925539,0.0001493974,0.00008844145,0.004696864,0.0002647444,0.4707621,0.1933892,0.3094685,0.0126588,0.0002291226],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4241696,0.006813749,0.4679078,0.001012098,0.0001397309,0.0000908953,0.0003210031,0.001937916,0.09760722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862944,0.0008697764,0.01111716,0.00007700645,0.00006786625,0.00004939908,0.0001084411,0.00009040625,0.001325377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001945737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005267382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02796613731701584,"score_gpt":0.2330186748727418,"score_spread":0.2050525375557259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}