{"id":"W2276316835","doi":"10.1109/temc.2015.2496144","title":"An Efficient Approach for Analyzing Shielding Effectiveness of Enclosure With Connected Accessory Based on Equivalent Dipole Modeling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility","topic":"Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Enclosure; Electromagnetic shielding; Electromagnetic compatibility; Partial element equivalent circuit; Dipole; Cable gland; Equivalent circuit; Moment (physics); Electrical engineering; Acoustics; Computer science; Electronic engineering; Engineering; Physics; Voltage","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001450931,0.0004221548,0.0006077844,0.0002896423,0.000163022,0.00004315623,0.0003369784,0.0001320602,0.00002155473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003359144,0.0003993571,0.0001667846,0.0006135671,0.00009050774,0.00009720309,0.000001456526,0.0004227778,0.000001128259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004215334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000193387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009505592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006944476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971302,0.0004278097,0.0005453053,0.0006943481,0.0006064785,0.0005959058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979243,0.0004898735,0.00007927346,0.0008687748,0.0003679555,0.0002698277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001529522,0.001564203,0.0002092593,0.0005396805,0.0000727921,5.014856e-7,0.0001659824,0.917394,0.07701572,0.00002014895,0.000001177129,0.00148695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002456632,0.006608091,0.001027875,0.0001395645,0.000152737,0.000001919619,0.00004847853,0.8542475,0.1348785,0.00008866339,3.85099e-7,0.0003496102],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5100149,0.00004686053,0.488628,0.0000034309,0.00007563999,0.0008869326,0.00002039805,0.0001735033,0.0001503729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928721,0.000001908442,0.006738202,0.000009293561,0.00001958337,0.0002722262,0.00002691734,0.0000571511,0.000002629066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4828572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03761411840373818,"score_gpt":0.2602890653973287,"score_spread":0.2226749469935905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}