{"id":"W2276438573","doi":"10.2172/947113","title":"Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP) Report for the Pend Oreille Wetlands Wildlife II Project, Technical Report 2002.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Wetland; Hydroelectricity; Drainage basin; Fishery; Critical habitat; Ecology; Endangered species; Cartography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01127471,0.001099777,0.0005903798,0.004020041,0.001026777,0.001518283,0.002244258,0.0005872765,0.05565624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01754048,0.0007819172,0.0004829567,0.003849069,0.0003627029,0.002003441,0.001375945,0.0009411295,0.03031464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002200646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006549939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03565352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04351745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940872,0.001409187,0.0006270127,0.0004003948,0.003197783,0.0002783223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841872,0.001583772,0.001053166,0.001695337,0.01104148,0.0004388467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002740499,0.0007538325,0.01973328,0.0003040952,0.00003556964,0.0001335363,0.0002565965,0.001010184,0.001479714,0.002236358,0.820977,0.1528058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002295527,0.0004300181,0.1383061,0.0004234036,0.00005369508,0.0001700938,0.0009847507,0.002768528,0.003883252,0.001975599,0.8506893,0.00008560964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03145286,0.0007088798,0.0825713,0.001767137,0.0008924488,0.03288581,0.6330609,0.004014328,0.2126464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02639191,0.0008429111,0.1047103,0.0007719379,0.0001125938,0.03547156,0.7219163,0.001290823,0.1084916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05565624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1861887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04266234570787128,"score_gpt":0.3195002798903844,"score_spread":0.2768379341825131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}