{"id":"W2277017378","doi":"","title":"Admissibility Compared: The Reception of Incriminating Expert Evidence (I.E., Forensic Science) in Four Adversarial Jurisdictions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Federal Rules of Evidence; Digital evidence; Forensic science; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Digital forensics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02075187,0.0002491971,0.0006969081,0.002857596,0.01643057,0.01316466,0.002230143,0.002604503,0.001539871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09813202,0.0005323284,0.0002474918,0.002241585,0.03101375,0.003373479,0.01205114,0.005143216,0.0001597414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0179703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01194051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1662402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2197842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9645609,0.01950019,0.001217155,0.002250084,0.009411261,0.00306046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9070795,0.06177788,0.008158551,0.00459327,0.01487811,0.003512581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003537548,0.0001279047,0.05208196,0.0001770555,0.00010042,0.002937562,0.7524,0.0008455672,0.004169643,0.1370782,0.002011226,0.04771671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008900278,0.00069438,0.2415667,0.0006408232,0.0003054017,0.001468572,0.6391219,0.00242357,0.007194703,0.0604948,0.04566795,0.0003320989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383682,0.0004539787,0.001056236,0.003008594,0.00005898458,0.00004577704,0.00001133166,0.00001088284,0.05698609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982979,0.00006744019,0.0002317329,0.0003445227,0.00001103203,0.000009127882,0.000003294783,0.000004988609,0.001030037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1662402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3305452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06183119103312358,"score_gpt":0.3077140182746072,"score_spread":0.2458828272414836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}