{"id":"W2277669182","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.001","title":"An appraisal of precipitation distribution in the high-altitude catchments of the Indus basin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Cryospheric studies and observations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken; International Development Research Centre; Department for International Development; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Indus; Precipitation; Structural basin; Altitude (triangle); Hydrology (agriculture); Distribution (mathematics); Drainage basin; Geology; Environmental science; Physical geography; Water resource management; Geomorphology; Geography; Mathematics; Meteorology; Cartography; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008608142,0.00006009206,0.00007782063,0.000007014806,0.000222754,0.000007727971,0.0007460423,0.00001627521,0.00009604585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000914055,0.000020069,0.00003873014,0.000281773,0.001100693,0.0001334776,0.00006596303,0.0000499429,0.000004126758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001623529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003113269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001905676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001258932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988836,0.0001165719,0.0001920012,0.0001183525,0.0005522532,0.0001372124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992043,0.0001810505,0.0001803291,0.0004070531,0.00001048951,0.00001681864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009964023,0.0004755015,0.7132604,0.00001952498,0.00003951369,2.332322e-7,0.009632678,0.194436,0.03430726,0.003422305,0.0003002146,0.04400678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001160817,0.0000719768,0.9951038,0.00001508091,0.00001027374,5.456191e-7,0.0006752111,0.0007350009,0.002802558,0.0003673697,0.00007092165,0.00003121252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968303,0.00004644337,0.00004910982,0.002434729,0.0002142719,0.0002343755,0.00009185582,0.000001316005,0.00009758024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998313,0.00003146585,0.00005562113,0.00001580199,0.00001521418,0.000002649983,0.000002830306,8.115168e-7,0.00004425761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2818434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4055549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01251304883402627,"score_gpt":0.2200488816971441,"score_spread":0.2075358328631178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}