{"id":"W2278017839","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.017","title":"A rural myth? Sources and implications of the perceived unfairness of carbon taxes in rural communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"Environment Canada; Carbon Management Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Economics; Opposition (politics); Carbon tax; Public economics; Disadvantaged; Revenue; Population; Tax reform; Economic growth; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Finance; Greenhouse gas","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004684145,0.0001014964,0.0002419761,0.001504789,0.002336477,0.003451368,0.0006435089,0.001313842,0.004616421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02662294,0.0001694061,0.0001321982,0.00275636,0.006065253,0.002627135,0.002316321,0.002560855,0.0001123142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004210011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003264526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02763214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04852019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973008,0.001509207,0.00005644192,0.0001683397,0.000520788,0.00044431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763056,0.01062038,0.00635027,0.0007481875,0.00388253,0.00209303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005388497,0.0005215876,0.3416206,0.0004153342,0.0003468223,0.001709944,0.1895262,0.002575872,0.001627462,0.3551945,0.0177582,0.08816476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008873119,0.000150355,0.4194957,0.0006208914,0.0001361985,0.0006039357,0.3820941,0.002688463,0.000909895,0.1393447,0.05377161,0.00009554028],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9032243,0.0007038104,0.001049629,0.06995212,0.00005160039,0.00001857338,0.0001252001,0.000008530616,0.02486623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.0001028069,0.00003671618,0.0004845062,0.00001972074,0.00000207626,0.000005686921,0.000002434823,0.000240421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02763214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05494261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0284132956112889,"score_gpt":0.2087594033794324,"score_spread":0.1803461077681434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}