{"id":"W2278114748","doi":"10.3141/2540-07","title":"Planning Urban Ring Rail Transit Lines: Case Study of Shanghai, China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Transit (satellite); Beijing; Ring road; Ring (chemistry); Shanghai china; Line (geometry); China; Transport engineering; Urban rail transit; Rail transit; Rapid transit; Public transport; Engineering; Geography; Mathematics; Regional science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007579038,0.0002772944,0.0005739177,0.001373516,0.001522152,0.0001205044,0.001063946,0.0002500423,0.0003350518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003754414,0.0001901507,0.0003637015,0.002831056,0.0009018416,0.001103154,0.000004478934,0.001318041,0.000006998032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002329018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009074237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04705691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1495211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989751,0.002396301,0.001907028,0.0004861239,0.004500693,0.0009588709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929259,0.001634671,0.0007727295,0.0004612982,0.003719822,0.0004855169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001651526,0.001012152,0.7772494,0.0001896497,0.0002851223,0.001902389,0.1941202,0.01019562,0.001673238,0.002486723,0.001881636,0.007352306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005158029,0.001504989,0.8654225,0.001140119,0.0001625794,0.000005388622,0.1185505,0.00009832793,0.0006398294,0.0008828382,0.006055611,0.000379278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895906,0.0001772432,0.005801596,0.002170709,0.00054032,0.00129214,0.00006474812,0.00005570573,0.0003069578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973796,0.0003777854,0.0008208693,0.00001373002,0.0003046975,0.00005449187,0.000006869825,0.00005656462,0.0009853966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1024642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1177397608550251,"score_gpt":0.419474711305807,"score_spread":0.3017349504507819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}