{"id":"W2278114748","doi":"10.3141/2540-07","title":"Planning Urban Ring Rail Transit Lines: Case Study of Shanghai, China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Transit (satellite); Beijing; Ring road; Ring (chemistry); Shanghai china; Line (geometry); China; Transport engineering; Urban rail transit; Rail transit; Rapid transit; Public transport; Engineering; Geography; Mathematics; Regional science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008474636,0.001056564,0.0004092078,0.0008608801,0.0009405208,0.0008869624,0.001115751,0.0009009096,0.002849022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001208053,0.0003815746,0.0006423634,0.002004245,0.0007967409,0.0007348561,0.0006992729,0.0004866885,0.0001640709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005518258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002659994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2025813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2110954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994901,0.0002325921,0.00001411645,0.00005293015,0.00006334221,0.0001468428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988808,0.0005364921,0.0001221573,0.00006590874,0.0001843355,0.00021029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003316748,0.0006531527,0.03369581,0.0001920416,0.0001042886,0.007029803,0.000694367,0.9379554,0.001412199,0.00533176,0.002550376,0.0100491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002485524,0.0007234808,0.02843547,0.00004034355,0.0001382176,0.0003940072,0.005007752,0.9572666,0.002236643,0.0015885,0.003850174,0.00007027919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915747,0.0001038423,0.0027097,0.000142422,0.000006653082,0.0001285182,0.0004158008,0.00005339897,0.004865112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948725,0.0001753511,0.002671763,0.00001916134,0.000003266042,0.00005213029,0.0003075055,0.0000102862,0.001887949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2025813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4028042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1177397608550251,"score_gpt":0.419474711305807,"score_spread":0.3017349504507819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}