{"id":"W2279195081","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00249","title":"Assessing Process Mass Intensity and Waste via an <i>aza</i>-Baylis–Hillman Reaction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chemical Education","topic":"Chemistry and Chemical Engineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Process engineering; Product (mathematics); Chemistry; Sustainability; Green chemistry; Allylic rearrangement; Biochemical engineering; Computer science; Combinatorial chemistry; Organic chemistry; Mathematics; Reaction mechanism; Engineering; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001402128,0.0004297278,0.0003586351,0.0005485535,0.0003673894,0.0006405447,0.0005113644,0.0004619318,0.001771607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001208575,0.0002440815,0.0003106057,0.0007125258,0.0003689897,0.000427736,0.0007964225,0.0006566444,0.0004515598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004591354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005679333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001053946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002117984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989556,0.000132581,0.00006629799,0.0001270538,0.0006079354,0.0001105043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992881,0.0001999454,0.0001968491,0.00005609123,0.0001955774,0.0000635094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004447845,0.0003954757,0.00726658,0.00009347653,0.00001865904,0.00006602435,0.0002580414,0.00198108,0.9627106,0.000439266,0.0001448785,0.026181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007740865,0.0008856455,0.004997781,0.000006762284,0.00001489938,0.00004566373,0.00009711058,0.002960514,0.9900838,0.0001272988,0.0007597355,0.0000130216],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631889,0.0001412711,0.03164927,0.00008631753,0.00001242648,0.0002671251,0.0001680691,0.0001679173,0.004318703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442728,0.0004220635,0.05046746,0.00005979628,0.000005236504,0.0001765645,0.0002702167,0.00004711771,0.00427861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001771607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007415235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01266481017600981,"score_gpt":0.2728743032935834,"score_spread":0.2602094931175736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}