{"id":"W227935814","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2001.019","title":"Uncertainties Associated with Assessing the Risk of an Endocrine Active Substance in the Canadian Environment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Endocrine system; Nonylphenol; Risk assessment; Environmental risk assessment; Organism; Hormone; Adverse effect; Limiting; Biology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Pharmacology; Endocrinology; Medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00881758,0.00011843,0.0001631063,0.00006532454,0.0009113171,0.0002103832,0.0006545889,0.00003493031,0.0005008053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003684608,0.00004710219,0.00006160379,0.0002362664,0.0007877948,0.0003377527,0.00006967528,0.001159282,0.00001610004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006017754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005022274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2876766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946281,0.002892437,0.0002956348,0.0002016654,0.001215741,0.0007664725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998669,0.0006844019,0.0001177468,0.0003165632,0.0000392796,0.0001730598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001590213,0.000446489,0.955151,0.000008323371,0.0001081146,0.0004194467,0.01527422,0.005176466,0.01478371,0.00005313563,0.0004035271,0.008016538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006954862,0.0002330638,0.9716047,0.00005870689,0.00001844449,0.0001212679,0.008007782,0.0002765814,0.01323534,0.002509991,0.003066768,0.0001718673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994689,0.00003315883,0.000006556581,0.00244204,0.00001463259,0.0002059331,0.00000864248,0.000003414757,0.00259665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994304,0.0001330525,0.0000684047,0.00006501342,0.00004197713,0.00001216151,0.000007470456,0.000009632864,0.0002319413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1146066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8324366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0683759022575032,"score_gpt":0.4290741261701465,"score_spread":0.3606982239126433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}