{"id":"W2279423935","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i1.4540","title":"Quiet Contributions: Re-Examining the Benefits of a Restorative Approach to Sentencing in the Aboriginal Context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Statutory law; Sentencing guidelines; Punishment (psychology); Economic Justice; Criminal law; Theory of criminal justice; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sentence; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01274109,0.0005004291,0.0003696971,0.002129345,0.02071845,0.01450603,0.004359925,0.004860366,0.004134906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03821668,0.0003336409,0.0006523755,0.001731497,0.02301937,0.008228813,0.009365477,0.01062515,0.0007984468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02473428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0395392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1705979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3214583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875188,0.007228249,0.0003076101,0.0006248486,0.002954709,0.001365809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761456,0.01351146,0.001204047,0.001498869,0.006045877,0.001594157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008062234,0.0001049507,0.005010541,0.0004020049,0.00003307747,0.00108303,0.2403219,0.0008726837,0.0005962852,0.656078,0.03064254,0.06477426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002731048,0.0002505253,0.01368212,0.001644437,0.0001774328,0.000908074,0.3935605,0.0013399,0.001398156,0.1352321,0.4516879,0.00009157418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1669636,0.01865625,0.01247739,0.2846967,0.009853194,0.0002901837,0.0001055538,0.0001359748,0.5068212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024474,0.009846869,0.005148575,0.02250275,0.00200573,0.0001545714,0.00004843867,0.0001010016,0.05774467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8294021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3392099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07348146613082397,"score_gpt":0.3689769529685731,"score_spread":0.2954954868377492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}