{"id":"W2280306538","doi":"10.1093/cybsec/tyv003","title":"Tipping the scales: the attribution problem and the feasibility of deterrence against cyberattack","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cybersecurity","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Office of Naval Research; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Attribution; Punishment (psychology); Value (mathematics); Computer security; Deterrence theory; Denial; Deception; Deterrence (psychology); Offensive; Law and economics; Evasion (ethics); Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01801686,0.001297144,0.001738971,0.002024571,0.002999753,0.006019238,0.002689008,0.005005093,0.009745414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1146354,0.000705041,0.001753158,0.00173907,0.01386448,0.0132783,0.006215755,0.006088919,0.001017042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002436666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001825224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002902368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009942329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841487,0.009121967,0.0005740123,0.001701615,0.003291468,0.001162154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8781436,0.08651146,0.01285484,0.01640548,0.00445401,0.001630607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001902024,0.0001446816,0.004815942,0.0001790532,0.00008596851,0.000165497,0.0009452079,0.02312757,0.0003838791,0.9057445,0.002407644,0.06180982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008284984,0.0001134943,0.002331343,0.000107898,0.00003452621,0.0002037434,0.0005195136,0.05567624,0.0003942604,0.9365244,0.003964605,0.00004711794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.243221,0.004193527,0.5165144,0.03494865,0.0006284564,0.0004179581,0.0002193806,0.0005391213,0.1993174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794644,0.0006895917,0.01414967,0.0005462668,0.0002008096,0.000149036,0.00003766614,0.00005076395,0.004711828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01801686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09528339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06699143555183751,"score_gpt":0.3397837847360448,"score_spread":0.2727923491842073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}