{"id":"W2280444571","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-40849-6_65","title":"A Novel Analytical Inverse Compensation Approach for Preisach Model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Magnetic Properties and Applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Inverse; Compensation (psychology); Invertible matrix; Hysteresis; Preisach model of hysteresis; Computer science; Function (biology); Differential (mechanical device); Dual (grammatical number); Control theory (sociology); Magnetic hysteresis; Mathematics; Physics; Artificial intelligence; Magnetic field; Magnetization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003205048,0.0009125894,0.0007542277,0.0005323688,0.0005749075,0.0009201584,0.00134124,0.001158116,0.006343921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007141937,0.0004038267,0.000928173,0.0004793401,0.0004166746,0.001294265,0.0007563655,0.00118949,0.003593795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003743446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006694226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001805088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997731,0.00004080186,0.00001076052,0.00004434105,0.0001137631,0.0000172343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998504,0.00003672901,0.00001015318,0.00003962738,0.00005705941,0.000006040591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001578848,0.0001523693,0.0003586744,0.0005135383,0.0001024309,0.0004288424,0.0003768464,0.2144299,0.1400559,0.2110673,0.01212419,0.4202322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008511181,0.00004280893,0.00009066126,0.00002442504,0.00002822254,0.0002548042,0.00003656373,0.9494391,0.01085128,0.0213,0.01789508,0.00002856208],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008529011,0.0001482512,0.995047,0.00004836266,0.00005813418,0.00001742591,0.00001904216,0.0003281931,0.003480663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1341163,0.0009948008,0.8303895,0.0003127977,0.0001855626,0.0002010178,0.0003287451,0.0005820735,0.03288924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006343921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02122259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04911154744503383,"score_gpt":0.2529581076923099,"score_spread":0.2038465602472761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}