{"id":"W2281879395","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2015-0013","title":"OPTIMAL DESIGN FOR A COMPOSITE WIND TURBINE BLADE WITH FATIGUE AND FAILURE CONSTRAINTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Wind Energy Research and Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"Université Libanaise","keywords":"Turbine blade; Blade (archaeology); Turbine; Rotor (electric); Structural engineering; Wind power; Renewable energy; Composite number; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008952057,0.001106232,0.0009847498,0.0005203236,0.0003120858,0.001002955,0.0004228211,0.001451991,0.002570713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001305043,0.0006947605,0.0007173592,0.0004084611,0.0005383798,0.0005196889,0.0005966839,0.0007455905,0.0005058937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004649061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001321594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003414643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003538774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997604,0.000100765,0.00001016956,0.00003748644,0.00005934828,0.00003186406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999612,0.0002122577,0.00004974499,0.00001217768,0.00009045117,0.00002338698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004483747,0.00002460732,0.0001914258,0.00008983351,0.0000134171,0.00008348765,0.0000265231,0.9876695,0.002427798,0.003804801,0.0003886339,0.005235068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001730057,0.00009127727,0.0001706987,0.00001148603,0.000009243838,0.00001706547,0.00002040363,0.9968458,0.0003469173,0.001608185,0.000855518,0.00000611186],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06636801,0.0009393194,0.9177112,0.0003138434,0.0001129583,0.0001525522,0.0001669267,0.0001319334,0.01410334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7203971,0.001020867,0.2667294,0.0001736182,0.00008816098,0.0005372518,0.0002599995,0.0001302909,0.01066341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003414643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008599937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02451256557070903,"score_gpt":0.2110194032394614,"score_spread":0.1865068376687524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}