{"id":"W2281879395","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2015-0013","title":"OPTIMAL DESIGN FOR A COMPOSITE WIND TURBINE BLADE WITH FATIGUE AND FAILURE CONSTRAINTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Wind Energy Research and Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"Université Libanaise","keywords":"Turbine blade; Blade (archaeology); Turbine; Rotor (electric); Structural engineering; Wind power; Renewable energy; Composite number; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001662502,0.0001300813,0.0001540483,0.00003799417,0.0001082333,0.00002498445,0.0001275904,0.00009972832,0.000005304836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001390769,0.0001063927,0.0001259958,0.0001349192,0.00005350474,0.00006647373,0.000003213971,0.0001497409,1.700684e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001932725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002278518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004009263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002033188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993044,0.000004292981,0.0001302925,0.0001132794,0.0001191484,0.000328598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993448,0.00007281214,0.00001135959,0.0001127381,0.00006618223,0.0003921015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001531579,0.000004812696,9.534811e-7,0.00008411409,0.000209361,3.450923e-7,0.0002459519,0.995098,0.003029607,0.000346296,0.0004940189,0.000471201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00163864,0.0001712819,0.00002121492,0.00009366474,0.00008140021,0.0000294548,0.0002913497,0.9573109,0.03644084,0.00009374962,0.003543024,0.0002844423],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01160563,0.00006738793,0.9871885,0.0004036465,0.00009225608,0.0004623317,0.0001080998,0.0000567475,0.0000154469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7786908,0.000004208443,0.2211259,0.00002201464,0.00002207465,0.00006729268,0.000006441648,0.0000298447,0.00003143571],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7670851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4338568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02451256557070903,"score_gpt":0.2110194032394614,"score_spread":0.1865068376687524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}