{"id":"W2282462875","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.1949","title":"Le géant aux pieds d’argile : de la fragilité des arguments éthiques de la réglementation antidopage","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008881394,0.0005077075,0.0004292926,0.001364628,0.00614416,0.007132409,0.001104658,0.007359542,0.005098213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01155526,0.00022178,0.0003837089,0.0009159641,0.03001108,0.00563955,0.00353282,0.00671901,0.0004867124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005783371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004532995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009557291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0118119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919003,0.005473678,0.0001396322,0.0006169571,0.001218313,0.0006511566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875674,0.009615724,0.0008748635,0.0003896606,0.001135992,0.0004164262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004380132,0.00001975572,0.0006621915,0.0001392646,0.00001783668,0.0002033888,0.02004436,0.0000887997,0.0001654308,0.9620596,0.008109678,0.008446068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006760009,0.0001249915,0.004075995,0.001605481,0.0000543254,0.0003860814,0.05806163,0.0004182991,0.0008138579,0.4421315,0.4921992,0.00006105954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06896877,0.02509713,0.00969846,0.4830365,0.002719043,0.00004208359,0.00006808995,0.00002674121,0.4103432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9109288,0.007300841,0.001746443,0.04480596,0.00120278,0.0000727115,0.00002062656,0.0000428349,0.03387889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009557291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04696983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01301626034011366,"score_gpt":0.3234501453729853,"score_spread":0.3104338850328716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}