{"id":"W2283830242","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.018","title":"Economic viability and small-scale fisheries — A review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Profitability index; Scale (ratio); Fishing; Sustainability; Fisheries law; Business; Fishery; Fisheries management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Finance; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007146614,0.0003918869,0.001636855,0.00002281775,0.0001152582,0.00007275135,0.0005664738,0.0003680202,0.08005159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001326777,0.0002623063,0.000336763,0.00004951275,0.000637593,0.0001549607,0.001475679,0.0003289035,0.002870966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007221063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007787782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000548082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005872676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977053,0.0001961656,0.0007367362,0.0008543332,0.00004375195,0.0004637368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998497,0.0004410237,0.000253898,0.000557437,0.000003371825,0.0002472844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002398463,0.00002786331,0.001485265,0.003162776,0.00002003317,0.000002642678,0.00000204509,9.275686e-8,4.744245e-9,0.00006567824,0.004691111,0.9905401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006764439,0.0001097523,0.0003281232,0.0004892791,0.00005531533,0.00002264185,0.00000118439,0.000005505733,2.546806e-8,0.0005313601,0.9980464,0.0003427537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001791333,0.769186,0.000002354128,0.0004460572,0.0001522643,0.001124893,0.00008747267,0.00004032675,0.2287815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000001318745,0.9945772,0.000218699,0.0002932753,0.00009657176,0.0003019077,0.00002537569,0.00002804439,0.004457557],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0418292509389675,"score_gpt":0.2780266871825944,"score_spread":0.2361974362436269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}