{"id":"W2285152100","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-4226-4_29","title":"Application of a New Experimental Method to Determine Bi-Material Interface Bonding Strength","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Conference proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Ultimate tensile strength; Discontinuity (linguistics); Interface (matter); Envelope (radar); Epoxy; Stiffness; Structural engineering; Finite element method; Stress (linguistics); Singularity; Strength of materials; Bonding strength; Material properties; Shear strength (soil); Viscoelasticity; Shear (geology); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247851,0.0008483131,0.000521559,0.001573747,0.0008144524,0.0006392621,0.001454369,0.000999604,0.004833562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001323912,0.0006841456,0.0003136978,0.0009764736,0.0008442758,0.001147651,0.0007892016,0.001165244,0.001356883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003603491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004688643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009513108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003053344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987447,0.0001451472,0.00006047244,0.0002876232,0.0007058489,0.00005612289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986134,0.0004282148,0.0001028479,0.0002676284,0.0005408526,0.00004712744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004021824,0.00007465864,0.0004322442,0.00008978177,0.00001311315,0.00001740074,0.0000398895,0.000117334,0.9873361,0.0005204515,0.0002543503,0.01106451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003070006,0.0003297736,0.004067251,0.00001468027,0.00004317693,0.0002445459,0.00007324554,0.006040485,0.9821849,0.0004042483,0.006530852,0.00003609901],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2593669,0.00440522,0.7086679,0.000381933,0.001109346,0.0005668788,0.001348899,0.002002347,0.02215055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5435378,0.002076188,0.4340824,0.0004199775,0.0001770224,0.001037268,0.001013268,0.0003484829,0.01730767],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004833562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01616985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03468534835854011,"score_gpt":0.2949548167282122,"score_spread":0.2602694683696721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}