{"id":"W2285840957","doi":"10.1080/10439463.2015.1102252","title":"An application of procedural justice to stakeholder perspectives: examining police legitimacy and public trust in police complaints systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policing & Society","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Procedural justice; Distrust; Legitimacy; Misconduct; Accountability; Law enforcement; Transparency (behavior); Public relations; Public trust; Criminal justice ethics; Stakeholder; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Criminology; Psychology; Perception; Law; Theory of criminal justice","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07102665,0.00048069,0.0006981296,0.005995654,0.01519908,0.0165867,0.002310607,0.003540748,0.002374051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1582863,0.0008458864,0.0008987787,0.003393107,0.05623157,0.01955099,0.01701611,0.006098273,0.0001333076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02056431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01752408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02978197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02715706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8924539,0.08471129,0.002842424,0.002585487,0.01079793,0.006609032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7608241,0.178189,0.03025309,0.007666805,0.01824233,0.004824699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000593811,0.00009116193,0.02597222,0.00009847381,0.00002776787,0.0002776433,0.9314836,0.0001234717,0.0002887106,0.03399349,0.00019016,0.007393856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001757677,0.0001066689,0.0211448,0.0002795888,0.00003037498,0.0002062039,0.9496009,0.00112233,0.0003249587,0.02156699,0.005551672,0.00004803832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9495684,0.0002838869,0.007759609,0.007886535,0.00004245302,0.0001212799,0.00001515823,0.000009172507,0.03431348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992173,0.00004715715,0.0003824877,0.0001662465,0.000006957598,0.00001711289,0.000002824765,0.000004205385,0.0001556606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07102665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3756293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1814577680128624,"score_gpt":0.4030351688717187,"score_spread":0.2215774008588563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}