{"id":"W2285937122","doi":"10.1177/0731684415617537","title":"Analysis of mesoscopic pore size in 3D-interlock fabrics and validation of a predictive permeability model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Materials science; Tortuosity; Composite material; Permeability (electromagnetism); Mesoscopic physics; Interlock; Composite number; Transverse plane; Porosity; Fiber; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003001041,0.0003131447,0.0002394231,0.0004186939,0.0001638778,0.0002548591,0.0004093309,0.0003911811,0.0003891964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000909131,0.0001658926,0.0003084927,0.0001883343,0.0004053919,0.0006012305,0.0001914915,0.000279199,0.00009422529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003683666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002480512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001032854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007691485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998703,0.00001811957,0.000005608899,0.00003125464,0.00005696604,0.0000177056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999458,0.0003207566,0.00007827258,0.00007771843,0.00005083627,0.00001433132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001071459,0.0001270633,0.002731294,0.0001114728,0.00001237303,0.0001974907,0.0001009971,0.7314439,0.2488344,0.004024296,0.00007693441,0.01223259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000191896,0.00002552815,0.001029082,0.000001787922,0.000002038575,0.00003585415,0.000007111011,0.9711046,0.02738009,0.0003159497,0.00009026672,0.000005840306],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7785463,0.0001833644,0.2187806,0.0000520634,0.000008796153,0.00003986129,0.0001585723,0.0004045932,0.00182574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900755,0.00008174164,0.009616272,0.000003074075,0.000001433996,0.0000200062,0.00003373471,0.00001095402,0.0001572603],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001032854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002672732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01403426110290925,"score_gpt":0.2318933081943853,"score_spread":0.217859047091476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}