{"id":"W2286062366","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2015-0222","title":"Carbon sequestration and the optimal forest harvest decision under alternative baseline policies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Pinus contorta; Offset (computer science); Carbon offset; Land tenure; Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Agricultural economics; Forestry; Geography; Greenhouse gas; Computer science; Agriculture; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002647459,0.0001072208,0.0001345424,0.0002934165,0.0002874971,0.0001681067,0.000449463,0.00005076701,0.0005343818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006075776,0.00005574497,0.00005147486,0.0002994053,0.001488205,0.0003687557,0.0000923152,0.0002449693,0.00009285664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003459642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002323491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0914713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4284957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982958,0.0002523759,0.0002730239,0.0001433673,0.0005553393,0.0004800488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985674,0.0005662926,0.0001005554,0.0002003535,0.00008451903,0.0004808491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003460321,0.0000223242,0.8811035,0.000008178547,0.00005549003,0.0001552568,0.001274626,0.008322516,0.0001781083,0.06473574,0.02608,0.01771824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002855167,0.00051334,0.9076734,0.0001759396,0.00002439196,0.0001168774,0.0002221627,0.00412183,0.0001400276,0.04384285,0.04008453,0.0002295414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812309,0.0001064836,0.0004274474,0.008952724,0.0001041713,0.0001944148,0.000006810811,0.000002600588,0.008974502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961334,0.000140812,0.0001739995,0.0001381301,0.0002689577,0.000004997544,0.000001025388,0.00001264115,0.003126031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3370244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9145787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04202466163144678,"score_gpt":0.3204171971089177,"score_spread":0.2783925354774709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}