{"id":"W2287909006","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800010080","title":"The Rogue Civil Airliner and International Human Rights Law: An Argument for a Proportionality of Effects Analysis within the Right to Life","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Proportionality (law); Human rights; Duty; Norm (philosophy); International law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Right to life; Law and economics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001506166,0.0002400427,0.0003027709,0.0004631974,0.001115722,0.0001841891,0.001834997,0.0001486476,0.0006838695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002871574,0.0001904672,0.0002723116,0.0001577866,0.0009355714,0.0004124742,0.00008661787,0.0002108605,0.00000781173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001318931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008373732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4558089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.973794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971769,0.0001514117,0.0007936191,0.0004701794,0.0009437278,0.0004641584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964353,0.0002955848,0.0004773148,0.0003464636,0.001728761,0.0007165902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008779976,0.0000811241,0.002391506,0.00000838268,0.001273128,0.0000156266,0.00311444,0.00008568349,0.00002654061,0.9921413,0.0007165537,0.00005789317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001023553,0.0002790522,0.02901824,0.0001543343,0.0003770393,0.00001987924,0.0004940962,0.001502711,0.001254072,0.6743646,0.29089,0.0006223908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5456075,0.00005723947,0.0007430849,0.008954396,0.003334228,0.001609794,0.001413573,0.00005566636,0.4382245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860191,0.000002776804,0.0006443437,0.001342566,0.0007014427,0.0001916233,0.0002182969,0.00002390104,0.01085591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.517985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8581344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01343038528858616,"score_gpt":0.2692233354006857,"score_spread":0.2557929501120995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}