{"id":"W2288024760","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkv136","title":"Retrospective Analysis of Synthetic Cannabinoid Metabolites in Urine of Individuals Suspected of Driving Impaired","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Analytical Toxicology","topic":"Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Synthetic cannabinoids; Urine; Cannabinoid; Forensic toxicology; Driving under the influence; Cannabis; Poison control; Medicine; Chemistry; Pharmacology; Injury prevention; Chromatography; Environmental health; Psychiatry; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004279502,0.0003169098,0.002938729,0.002989216,0.00004185412,0.000005331264,0.0005790236,0.0007069964,0.00119975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00422519,0.0002713159,0.0009561089,0.003807998,0.00137239,0.0001553025,0.0001615656,0.001117774,0.00000347936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002569679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005884072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006395058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003763835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943926,0.001541866,0.002632576,0.0003346858,0.0005401758,0.0005580648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943812,0.001232941,0.002255115,0.0003543386,0.001332397,0.0004440232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009069835,0.002241369,0.9420571,0.00005188135,0.01198549,0.0001334047,0.001369503,0.01238366,0.01913344,0.008201981,0.001052294,0.000482928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00510642,0.003054018,0.8730009,0.00005771724,0.02018419,0.0001080036,0.001344901,0.01917678,0.07107165,0.005667975,0.0008273228,0.0004001616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958315,0.0007125089,0.000142942,0.001309584,0.000380925,0.0001633413,0.00007675908,0.000009940212,0.001372478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998848,0.0001409711,0.0005310565,0.0001392313,0.00009225922,0.000003754669,0.000009302106,0.00001778092,0.0002176594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0690562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05838983975628976,"score_gpt":0.3952776006189077,"score_spread":0.336887760862618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}