{"id":"W2289101218","doi":"10.1177/0969141315610790","title":"Audit feedback on reading performance of screening mammograms: An international comparison","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Screening","topic":"Global Cancer Incidence and Screening","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Medicine; Audit; Mammography; Screening mammography; Recall rate; Quality assurance; Breast screening; Recall; Medical physics; Breast cancer; Cancer; Accounting; Pathology; External quality assessment; Psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01967191,0.000368528,0.0005456962,0.003159602,0.0004253267,0.0008374446,0.0004851829,0.0005382441,0.002277919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07437043,0.0002386912,0.0007028547,0.002889948,0.0007559893,0.001291609,0.001364109,0.0004459624,0.0003333614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001218934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008427732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002130005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002277378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840828,0.008935288,0.002219637,0.0007391925,0.003357165,0.0006659687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9098918,0.04037023,0.0261348,0.003687443,0.01751658,0.002399237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003796835,0.0005126309,0.9257388,0.0006514625,0.000330283,0.0001140821,0.004214863,0.0002202366,0.000495254,0.000155246,0.0009843,0.06278605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001055217,0.002445219,0.9924837,0.000233989,0.0001672847,0.0002845587,0.001971768,0.0003005172,0.0004726318,0.00005644768,0.001459068,0.0000192244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929062,0.001421649,0.0005823446,0.0002510949,0.00005946325,0.000168377,0.0003680143,0.00003342098,0.004209456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989427,0.0002903324,0.0002726284,0.00004529841,0.00001822133,0.00004756305,0.0002091741,0.000007774798,0.0001663388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01967191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1040362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09527687553669092,"score_gpt":0.3861126826422218,"score_spread":0.2908358071055309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}