{"id":"W2289498414","doi":"10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/l15","title":"THE PDS 66 CIRCUMSTELLAR DISK AS SEEN IN POLARIZED LIGHT WITH THE GEMINI PLANET IMAGER","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","topic":"Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics; Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Polarization (electrochemistry); Planet; Circumstellar disk; Asymmetry; Polarimetry; Hubble space telescope; Astrophysics; Astronomy; Azimuth; Debris disk; Optics; Stars; Scattering; Planetary system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001032171,0.0001848302,0.00009027522,0.0005440683,0.0002385635,0.0003349661,0.0001245188,0.0001446796,0.001198292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001932778,0.0001194991,0.00009435027,0.0003864679,0.0001453152,0.0001571081,0.0002523642,0.0001847513,0.0003213388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005552805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001297659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001592382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999424,0.000005103298,0.000002425168,0.00001503448,0.00001803254,0.00001708112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998838,0.00001084045,0.00003931248,0.00001701858,0.00002010612,0.00002889849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000886698,0.0001339854,0.3466531,0.00008285298,0.00005386741,0.001712849,0.0006589398,0.001099844,0.6215199,0.0003366675,0.001900202,0.02496108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120116,0.0001067729,0.9686614,0.000007632849,0.00001746703,0.000799026,0.0001581532,0.001459116,0.02677822,0.00004712394,0.001946243,0.00000672227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996825,0.00005095411,0.0003476735,0.00002259407,0.000005826698,0.000006064582,0.0005807168,0.00005285278,0.002108337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985341,0.00003989884,0.0005675379,0.00001051135,0.000007007018,0.000002481939,0.0005362376,0.000009838873,0.0002923382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001297659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00400871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003691268749249421,"score_gpt":0.1955056227194142,"score_spread":0.1918143539701648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}