{"id":"W2289505320","doi":"10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i31/93731","title":"Verification of SPL Feature Model by using Bayesian Network","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Science and Technology","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Feature model; Computer science; Bayesian network; Data mining; Software product line; Software; Dynamic Bayesian network; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Tree (set theory); Cardinality (data modeling); Pattern recognition (psychology); Machine learning; Software development; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003481005,0.0007581833,0.0007755657,0.002456775,0.000772986,0.001693004,0.001955723,0.001024503,0.003046561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02143146,0.0006503407,0.002139712,0.000942124,0.001284828,0.003675943,0.001172469,0.001660931,0.0004450107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001668894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002219359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01213694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00961307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951199,0.001114169,0.0003103363,0.001210381,0.001978342,0.0002668733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877229,0.007513238,0.001398674,0.001127762,0.002117606,0.0001198123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005760682,0.0001843127,0.02032885,0.0002960273,0.0002915774,0.001341466,0.0005278626,0.7457989,0.01664338,0.1180249,0.001946252,0.09404045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001727549,0.00002630011,0.0007689676,0.00002072655,0.00003835744,0.0001119392,0.00002282854,0.9685393,0.002525722,0.02733309,0.0005790925,0.00001638664],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02968541,0.00004412436,0.9676642,0.0001412805,0.00001132483,0.00006954671,0.0003226491,0.00046177,0.001599668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7270531,0.0002065098,0.2687525,0.0001100867,0.00003713834,0.0002779989,0.001443243,0.0001498626,0.001969738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01213694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02413261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.018165262462191,"score_gpt":0.2680710268672425,"score_spread":0.2499057644050515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}