{"id":"W2289505320","doi":"10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i31/93731","title":"Verification of SPL Feature Model by using Bayesian Network","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Science and Technology","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Feature model; Computer science; Bayesian network; Data mining; Software product line; Software; Dynamic Bayesian network; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian probability; Tree (set theory); Cardinality (data modeling); Pattern recognition (psychology); Machine learning; Software development; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009277251,0.00006593559,0.0001476285,0.000396949,0.00009195151,0.00001794139,0.0008887416,0.0000901547,3.201273e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067084,0.00004435216,0.00001567229,0.00114091,0.0009011335,0.0006892547,0.0001160801,0.0001345517,1.922744e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004986173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001984236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.702007e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.237719e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992235,0.00001522147,0.0001806125,0.0001518934,0.0002124579,0.000216361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991159,0.00007293466,0.0002540948,0.0002328697,0.0002684861,0.0000556853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007740649,0.00001945988,0.001844155,0.00001260777,0.0000122287,0.0000349737,0.0003852707,0.01325378,0.555141,0.03386913,0.0003505614,0.3950692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001009544,0.0007782551,0.0007978629,0.0005588471,0.00001942567,0.002362665,0.0002572201,0.06219388,0.4563582,0.4740136,0.001089684,0.0005608145],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1163146,0.0003524983,0.8816245,0.001494644,0.0001504714,0.00002512101,7.198965e-7,0.00003188762,0.000005550987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5238464,0.00004978537,0.4760691,0.00001370422,0.00001137934,2.568125e-7,8.594875e-9,0.000001957186,0.000007405315],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4401445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3320264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.018165262462191,"score_gpt":0.2680710268672425,"score_spread":0.2499057644050515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}