{"id":"W2290588755","doi":"10.19053/01217488.3652","title":"Revisión taxonómica de los subgéneros Hyalodaphnia y Daphnia [género Daphnia], mediante el uso de marcadores moleculares y Código de Barras [COI]. (Taxonomic Revision of the Subgenus Daphnia and Hyalodaphnia [Daphnia genus] using Molecular Markers and Barcodes [COI].9","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"CIENCIA EN DESARROLLO","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Daphnia pulex; Subgenus; Biology; Humanities; Zoology; Taxonomy (biology); Daphnia; Crustacean; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003945808,0.001611894,0.001615218,0.0004870747,0.001292756,0.0004179425,0.002487927,0.0008811766,0.000217016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001425764,0.001508975,0.000612274,0.001301492,0.005184109,0.0008833507,0.003753944,0.001164469,0.00007494092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002418897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003916373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001997353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001687888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896467,0.002004023,0.001546264,0.00235423,0.001943729,0.00250504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947249,0.0005663044,0.00111617,0.001896889,0.00009301722,0.001602679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003233253,0.0002035875,0.6135228,0.0004239255,0.0002587817,0.0002278072,0.00198382,0.001220581,0.3772632,0.00009640779,0.001769294,0.002706432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002941974,0.0006535987,0.8810831,0.001511945,0.001280142,0.0005849933,0.002394664,0.007373518,0.09279417,0.000430644,0.006724937,0.0022263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795426,0.01487341,0.001188512,0.0005717051,0.0002772732,0.002099596,0.0007247615,0.000110341,0.0006118001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672643,0.00594963,0.02538392,0.0008918719,0.0001487748,0.00004694601,0.00002757606,0.0001830862,0.0001039245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.284469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01475043631784754,"score_gpt":0.2413709642793597,"score_spread":0.2266205279615121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}