{"id":"W2290588755","doi":"10.19053/01217488.3652","title":"Revisión taxonómica de los subgéneros Hyalodaphnia y Daphnia [género Daphnia], mediante el uso de marcadores moleculares y Código de Barras [COI]. (Taxonomic Revision of the Subgenus Daphnia and Hyalodaphnia [Daphnia genus] using Molecular Markers and Barcodes [COI].9","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"CIENCIA EN DESARROLLO","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Daphnia pulex; Subgenus; Biology; Humanities; Zoology; Taxonomy (biology); Daphnia; Crustacean; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004034972,0.0008449994,0.0006899284,0.005800274,0.001889174,0.001906604,0.001526786,0.0005904554,0.003021601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002969644,0.0002598451,0.0008173671,0.002560178,0.0007983465,0.001533507,0.001555001,0.0009679958,0.001297385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002677498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006447088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04586786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08360785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979165,0.0002822509,0.0003009302,0.0004917508,0.0008309365,0.0001775741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993493,0.0003841155,0.001090495,0.0005493398,0.004185413,0.0002975776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002794231,0.0001141427,0.1513823,0.001509215,0.0001947108,0.0006432374,0.003396211,0.0005504055,0.05040301,0.002693642,0.01080224,0.7780316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004664499,0.0005692823,0.4844469,0.001950783,0.0007626053,0.002207876,0.00393713,0.001805818,0.01844023,0.002027522,0.4836994,0.0001058018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6181266,0.08117421,0.1672105,0.005721432,0.005603048,0.003709019,0.01961431,0.002059966,0.09678103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5596676,0.02987508,0.3373286,0.002782238,0.0008130043,0.001269751,0.02188946,0.0002659116,0.04610842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04586786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09120178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01475043631784754,"score_gpt":0.2413709642793597,"score_spread":0.2266205279615121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}