{"id":"W2290856329","doi":"10.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.033","title":"Local quality assessment of point clouds for indoor mobile mapping","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neurocomputing","topic":"3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Point cloud; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Feature (linguistics); Data mining; Quality (philosophy); Computer vision; RGB color model; Point (geometry); Quality assessment; Feature extraction; Mobile mapping; Pattern recognition (psychology); Evaluation methods; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008774369,0.0005115416,0.0005509678,0.001851319,0.0003053125,0.001287291,0.0005777122,0.0005364781,0.001021089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003409412,0.000220427,0.0005567804,0.001781327,0.0003539029,0.0009965426,0.001012424,0.0003885592,0.000386896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004863476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005540681,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006769642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007371301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992284,0.0001211913,0.00003268795,0.0001001411,0.0004320655,0.00008564312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986033,0.0002878434,0.0001811402,0.0002132707,0.0006427149,0.00007168789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001122855,0.0002181525,0.04929683,0.0004988832,0.0002909318,0.0002554731,0.0003228774,0.3474034,0.07440698,0.003501796,0.002853148,0.5198287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002165056,0.0001385042,0.0261107,0.00002987774,0.00008437267,0.0001611635,0.0002210628,0.953742,0.01712019,0.001513878,0.0008271247,0.00002942019],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2624151,0.0006940929,0.7339664,0.00009784578,0.00004282959,0.0000710278,0.0006807277,0.0007753977,0.001256685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486785,0.0002838227,0.04975088,0.00001587694,0.0000231358,0.0000236402,0.0006623982,0.00005980421,0.0005018661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006769642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01346052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0521704276807036,"score_gpt":0.2976153728111423,"score_spread":0.2454449451304387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}