{"id":"W2291070285","doi":"10.1017/etds.2015.24","title":"Poly-time computability of the Feigenbaum Julia set","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems","topic":"Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Julia set; Computability; Set (abstract data type); Computable number; Computable analysis; Mathematics; Time complexity; Polynomial; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Programming language; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003609504,0.0002381582,0.000475964,0.00004959957,0.0001475446,0.0001252859,0.00129402,0.0001520662,0.00001079018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003638109,0.0001560113,0.0001422987,0.0004106176,0.0005061498,0.0001960404,0.00106708,0.0002509593,0.00004122455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001197087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001440671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000131233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005733261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996126,0.001856124,0.0005503827,0.0005877157,0.0005128565,0.000366947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973565,0.0008492534,0.0001909721,0.001158737,0.0001466149,0.000297893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001900123,0.0005560978,0.0119346,0.0002717575,0.0001139683,0.00001716071,0.003882115,0.003128693,0.000400501,0.9521797,0.0008253895,0.02649995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007762791,0.0002533357,0.01508863,0.00007100446,0.00002327851,0.0001632053,0.0002055192,0.8037837,0.00008175233,0.1779018,0.001249205,0.0004023046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4770101,0.002006398,0.5156131,0.0005213579,0.002379036,0.0006504332,0.0000358721,0.0002675794,0.001516064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981873,0.000001286079,0.001244632,0.00007486527,0.0001174244,0.00001120506,0.000002661712,0.00001014248,0.0003505031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.800655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6361957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01476135887961431,"score_gpt":0.2306027538669675,"score_spread":0.2158413949873532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}