{"id":"W2291070285","doi":"10.1017/etds.2015.24","title":"Poly-time computability of the Feigenbaum Julia set","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems","topic":"Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Julia set; Computability; Set (abstract data type); Computable number; Computable analysis; Mathematics; Time complexity; Polynomial; Algorithm; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Programming language; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009338853,0.0005211169,0.001039637,0.001213594,0.001794069,0.004237875,0.001426931,0.001227008,0.00686436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006561716,0.0003802007,0.001215272,0.001029311,0.003666346,0.004958178,0.001946733,0.002864278,0.0007806561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002515305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001199397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001672005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001430952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989722,0.000149488,0.00004890686,0.0002710504,0.0002979201,0.0002603864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960136,0.002590131,0.000214495,0.0005688012,0.0003142061,0.0002987059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003851196,0.00002000388,0.0002376473,0.000041194,0.000008759022,0.0001233321,0.0001664789,0.006040142,0.001925491,0.9885322,0.0004439864,0.002422194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002205335,0.00001561632,0.0001323384,0.00001290187,0.00001063461,0.00007021179,0.0000410797,0.03362043,0.002363208,0.9617605,0.001936859,0.00001425444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4268696,0.0007696355,0.5035166,0.001973583,0.0001705765,0.00015671,0.0005515949,0.001598796,0.06439306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505885,0.0002025206,0.0432675,0.0001170603,0.00007431456,0.0001585022,0.0002055197,0.0001487991,0.005237294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00686436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02296358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01476135887961431,"score_gpt":0.2306027538669675,"score_spread":0.2158413949873532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}